git: 022ca2fc7fe0 - main - Add aio_writev and aio_readv
Alan Somers
asomers at freebsd.org
Tue Jan 5 23:26:51 UTC 2021
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:11 PM Brooks Davis <brooks at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 10:09:04PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 9:39 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27 at freebsd.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 3 Jan 2021, at 02:59, Alan Somers <asomers at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/sys/kern/syscalls.master b/sys/kern/syscalls.master
> > > > index b7ea5e939635..aaa0a1277461 100644
> > > > --- a/sys/kern/syscalls.master
> > > > +++ b/sys/kern/syscalls.master
> > > > @@ -1477,7 +1477,17 @@
> > > > _In_opt_ struct sigevent *sig
> > > > );
> > > > }
> > > > -258-271 AUE_NULL UNIMPL nosys
> > > > +258 AUE_AIO_WRITEV STD {
> > > > + int aio_writev(
> > > > + _Inout_ struct aiocb *aiocbp
> > > > + );
> > > > + }
> > > > +259 AUE_AIO_READV STD {
> > > > + int aio_readv(
> > > > + _Inout_ struct aiocb *aiocbp
> > > > + );
> > > > + }
> > > > +260-271 AUE_NULL UNIMPL nosys
> > > > 272 AUE_O_GETDENTS COMPAT11 {
> > > > int getdents(
> > > > int fd,
> > >
> > > Should these not be added to the end?
> > >
> > > Jess
> > >
> >
> > Should they be? I'm not aware of any requirement to add new syscalls to
> > the end. I put them here so they would be next to the other AIO
> syscalls.
>
> Yes. I'm sorry I missed this in the review. It's vastly easier to audit
> these files and address conflicts if they are append-only. We're also
> using these syscall numbers internally specifically to avoid conflicts
> with new syscalls. Please move them to the end.
>
> I do see that we only provide extremely outdated advice in the comments
> of syscalls.master. I'll take a look at improving this and the wiki
> page.
>
> Thanks,
> Brooks
>
Ok, I'll move them. And could you please elaborate on how we're "using
these syscall numbers internally"?
-Alan
More information about the dev-commits-src-main
mailing list