git: af459b5bcc0f - main - news/sabnzbdplus: use archivers/par2cmdline

[Rene Ladan]

On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 12:45:23AM +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
> Rene Ladan <rene at freebsd.org> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
> >
> >> Rene Ladan <rene at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> > The branch main has been updated by rene:
> >> >
> >> > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=af459b5bcc0fee9c6353955f8a48cf26a93051b5
> >> >
> >> > commit af459b5bcc0fee9c6353955f8a48cf26a93051b5
> >> > Author:     Rene Ladan <rene at FreeBSD.org>
> >> > AuthorDate: 2021-04-30 11:34:06 +0000
> >> > Commit:     Rene Ladan <rene at FreeBSD.org>
> >> > CommitDate: 2021-04-30 11:34:06 +0000
> >> >
> >> >     news/sabnzbdplus: use archivers/par2cmdline
> >> >     
> >> >     Previously this port used archivers/par2cmdline-tbb, but that port has
> >> >     expired in favor of par2cmdline.
> >> >     
> >> >     While here pet portclippy.
> >> 
> >> Can you land the patch in bug 250411 (broken by "pet portclippy") as well?
> >
> > How is that related, except for being about the same port?
> 
> This commit created extra work due to mixing style bits with funcitonal
> changes into one blob. Which part was functional, only RUN_DEPENDS?
> Applying bug 250411 now requires un-doing then re-doing the style bits,
> which would be easier if this commit was split in two, like often done
> in src/ land and facilitated by Git.
> 
Yes, only RUN_DEPEPNDS and PORTREVISION were functional.

> Sorry, my original mail was worded poorly.

René