git: 8c256a205fa0 - main - benchmarks/kdiskmark: the port had been updated (+)
Alexey Dokuchaev
danfe at freebsd.org
Fri Jul 23 11:58:18 UTC 2021
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 01:33:57PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:28:23 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 01:24:50PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:17:12 GMT
> > > Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > benchmarks/kdiskmark: the port had been updated (+)
> > > >
> > > > - Update KDiskMark to version 2.2.1
> > >
> > > Is it that hard for you to put in the first line
> > > "benchmarks/kdiskmark: update to version 2.2.1" ???
> >
> > I do that if that's the only change in the commit. This time it
> > was not, there were other changes documented in the commit log,
>
> benchmarks/kdiskmark: update to version 2.2.1
> While here :
> - Make cache clearing and KDE dependency optional
> - Amend port description and add pkg-help file
>
> There, I've fixed it for you.
This would imply that update is the main change which is not always
the case. In general, splitting the bullet list of N items into
1 subject + N-1 items looks a bit ugly. Also, "cat/port: update ..."
sounds less grammatically incorrect than when using passive voice.
> > so the first line should be ignored (it is marked with plus sign
> > for that reason).
>
> The first line is the mail subject message and what shown in git log
> --onleline so it needs to contain proper info and not something that
> should be ignored.
It does contain proper info, just not very detailed one, which is not
very important for --onleline format anyway.
./danfe
More information about the dev-commits-ports-all
mailing list