cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen
Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c
src/sys/sys param.h
Yar Tikhiy
yar at comp.chem.msu.su
Mon Jan 28 14:07:14 PST 2008
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:40:09AM -1000, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * Yar Tikhiy <yar at comp.chem.msu.su> [ 2008-01-28 ]
> [ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys param.h ]
> > But, hey, have you seen the diffs in the first place? You seem to
> > assume that my commit was only to kill the innocent int64_t.
>
> Yes, actually. I found some of the decisions strange, the work overall
> worthwhile and the "long long" change particularly gauche. Several others have
> said things that I thought at the time, and I was following the discussion
> closely. (Your bogus standards reasoning was, in particular, a red flag, and I
> suspect that that caught some people off-guard since your reasoning is
> fallacious
It's your right to think so and express your thoughts. It's OK by
me. But I'd really appreciate if you people kept characteristics
like "silly" and "bogus" to until your opponent's POV actually
proved such. It isn't a TV show where the side who denounces the
other one louder wins the prize in the end.
> and that you would have gotten less grief for the change if you had
> given less strange justifications (even no justifications) initially.)
It was exactly the justification I told to myself when considering
the new types. I don't think I should have invented a lie for the
commit message in order to satisfy the sensitive folks. And I hate
commit messages w/o technical background for the change.
> You said
> that you had received no back-out request, so I made one. Instead of
> acknowledging that you had now received a single backout request which you would
> not honor (and I was only referring to the "long long" bit, for clarity), you
> chose to grouch that I was rehashing old points (I do not believe backout
> requests should come without reasoning attached.)
Thank you for providing it. Now all is in the hands of core at .
--
Yar
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list