cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 frag6.c icmp6.c in6.c
in6_ifattach.c in6_pcb.c in6_proto.c in6_rmx.c in6_src.c
ip6_input.c ip6_mroute.c ip6_output.c mld6.c nd6.c nd6_nbr.c
nd6_rtr.c raw_ip6.c udp6_usrreq.c
David O'Brien
obrien at freebsd.org
Tue Jan 8 19:32:28 PST 2008
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:39:11PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > obrien 2008-01-08 19:08:58 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > sys/netinet6 frag6.c icmp6.c in6.c in6_ifattach.c
> > in6_pcb.c in6_proto.c in6_rmx.c in6_src.c
> > ip6_input.c ip6_mroute.c ip6_output.c
> > mld6.c nd6.c nd6_nbr.c nd6_rtr.c
> > raw_ip6.c udp6_usrreq.c
> > Log:
> > un-__P()
>
> Do we do that again w/o immediate need and other changes to that file?
I was studying the code. I don't think its wrong to clean up in that
situation. Especially since we had un-__P'ing parties in the past (just
for that reason), and we skipped netinet6 to make it easy to sync with
KAME. gnn declared a while back that we should feel free to make
FreeBSD-specific changes at this point.
--
-- David (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list