cvs commit: src/etc Makefile sensorsd.conf src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d Makefile sensorsd src/lib/libc/gen sysctl.3 src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 sysctl.c src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/share/man/man9 Makefile sensor_attach.9 src/sys/conf f

[Julian Elischer]

Sam Leffler wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> Quoting Scott Long <scottl at samsco.org> (Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:50:05 -0600):

keep in mind htere are a lot of people out here that have no opinion
as we haven't looked at it in detail, who may like the idea of a sensor
framework but don't know enough about this implementation to chime in.

I've seen 4 people who say they don't like it,  and 3  or 
4 (I wasn't counting) who said that they either liked it or at least 
didn't see anything wrong with it.

SO it's not a clear cut as it may appear.

Having spent some time in past lives supporting various sensors,
I know that there is a crying need  for some sort of framework
but that doesn't mean that it needs to be this one, or even in the kernel.

Maybe we can find someone to arbitrate. We used to have an 
architecture board for 
this purpose but we got rid of it.



>>