cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sysinstall main.c

[Andrey Chernov]

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:30:32AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:48:28AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:39:57PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > Using the strategy "commit to -current then suffer the fallout"
> > > is pretty bogus.
> > 
> > The only possible. Nobody can run all ports at once. Kris already promise 
> > all ports build results with those changes in, lets see.
> 
> There have been many runs, in the past, with src changes put into the
> cluster and then tested, before the src changes were committed.  This is
> the process that is always used to get new versions of gcc into the tree,
> for instance.

This ones are not such vital as gcc changes which can break all programs 
at once, so can't be ever nearly compared with. For what we have --current 
for, if every change will go to the cluster first?

And the question remains:
Is something currently broken _for_you_? I still have no reports.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/