cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c
John Baldwin
jhb at freebsd.org
Fri Jun 22 16:34:51 UTC 2007
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 03:22:39 am David Xu wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday 06 June 2005 01:13:11 am David Xu wrote:
> >
> >>davidxu 2005-06-06 05:13:11 UTC
> >>
> >> FreeBSD src repository
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> >> sys/kern kern_sig.c
> >> Log:
> >> Fix a bug relavant to debugging, a masked signal unexpectedly interrupts
> >> a sleeping thread when process is being debugged.
> >>
> >> PR: GNU/77818
> >> Tested by: Sean C. Farley <sean-freebsd at farley org>
> >
> >
> > This actually breaks other debugging as now debuggers or other processes
using
> > procfs/ptrace to catch signals can no longer see ignored signals or
> > SIGSTOP/SIGCONT. The latter breaks strace when execing a new child
process
> > as it opens a race where the child process hangs because the parent
doesn't
> > ever see that the child process has stopped itself with SIGSTOP (the
parent
> > resumes it with SIGCONT when it sees that). The signal shouldn't make it
to
> > the target thread if it is ignored, but the process should be stopped and
the
> > debugger notified of all signals.
> >
>
> Where can you find the place SIGSTOP can be masked or ignored ?
> Though SIGCONT can be ignored but it still can resume a suspended
> process. if ignored signals can be seen by debugger, then a sleep(10)
> will be interrupted by ignored signals when the process is being
> debugged, but will work correctly if it is not being debugged, this
> becauses issignal() must be called by debugged thread to report any
> signals to debugger, the thread should be woken up.
I added a printf to stopevent() for S_SIG and it wasn't invoked for SIGSTOP,
so PIOCSTATUS ioctl via procfs never returns a status saying the process is
stopped on SIGSTOP. Rather than try to untangle the mess that is the signal
code I just patched strace to use the same algo truss does for exec'ing a new
child process. 4.x worked fine though both for gdb and the existing strace
algo, so 6.x as it currently stands is a regression.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list