cvs commit: src/games/fortune/datfiles fortunes fortunes-o.real

[Doug Barton]

John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 January 2007 12:55, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 30 December 2006 at 21:54:41 +0000, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> dougb       2006-12-30 21:54:41 UTC
>>>>
>>>>   FreeBSD src repository
>>>>
>>>>   Modified files:
>>>>     games/fortune/datfiles fortunes fortunes-o.real
>>>>   Log:
>>>>   Add the fortunes from the PR that were not already present.
>>>>   Delete some duplicates found while double checking the new ones,
>>>>   and fix a typo.
>>>>
>>>>   These haven't been sorted yet, but will be in a future commit.
>>> Why didn't you sort them first?
>> Because the rest of the files are not sorted either, and I wanted to
>> keep the commits separate.
>>
>> I have a patch that I'm going to work on getting into the tree today
>> that adds a comment to each file about sorting, and then I'll sort the
>> files obviously. (All of which was discussed and consensus reached a
>> little while ago, I think on -current.) I was going to do it
>> yesterday, but family obligations kept me away from the keyboard.
> 
> src/games/fortune/tools/do_sort

Yes, the patch I have adds a note about that.

> They should already be largely sorted (at least 'fortunes') as they've
> been explicitly sorted via do_sort in the past.

They are for the most part, yes. But when I added the new fortunes and
then sorted the file, it was enough different that I felt it would be
better to do it in two stages.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection