cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h

[David O'Brien]

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:30:29PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20070828005654.GA50401 at dragon.NUXI.org>
>             "David O'Brien" <obrien at freebsd.org> writes:
> : On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:36:15PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708242252520.15344 at sea.ntplx.net>
> : >             Daniel Eischen <deischen at freebsd.org> writes:
> : > : I guess the build system should be more tolerant of this, but
> : > : there are bound to be problems regardless.  I don't see why
> : > : the install tools can't also either have their own set of
> : > : libraries (utilizing LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or be built static.
> : > 
> : > There's much resistance to building everything that the build system
> : > might be used being build static.  It adds too much time and
> : > complexity to the build system, the opponents say.
> : 
> : I've never heard an argument against building these bits static.
> : What's the issue?
> 
> I thought you were one of the folks making this argument when we last
> changed the FILE structure and related hangers on.

Hum, I don't recall having that position against static binaries.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)