cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em LICENSE README if_em.c if_em.h
if_em_hw.c if_em_hw.h if_em_osdep.h
John Baldwin
jhb at freebsd.org
Wed Sep 6 13:16:19 PDT 2006
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 13:26, LI Xin wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > If memory serves me right, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> jhb 2006-09-05 19:48:10 UTC
> >>
> >> FreeBSD src repository
> >>
> >> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4)
> >> sys/dev/em LICENSE README if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.c
> >> if_em_hw.h if_em_osdep.h
> >> Log:
> >> Sync up with most of the changes to RELENG_6 including using bus_dma,
> >> new PCI IDs, lots of style changes, suspend/resume methods. Things not
> >> included include the INTR_FAST + taskqueue changes, link flapping
> >> workarounds in em_ioctl(), and jumbo frame fixups for architectures
that
> >> require strict alignment.
> >>
> >> Revision Changes Path
> >> 1.1.2.3 +3 -1 src/sys/dev/em/LICENSE
> >> 1.1.2.10 +65 -23 src/sys/dev/em/README
> >> 1.2.2.24 +1867 -1498 src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c
> >> 1.1.2.19 +165 -185 src/sys/dev/em/if_em.h
> >> 1.1.2.14 +3236 -756 src/sys/dev/em/if_em_hw.c
> >> 1.1.2.14 +807 -56 src/sys/dev/em/if_em_hw.h
> >> 1.1.2.16 +63 -32 src/sys/dev/em/if_em_osdep.h
> >
> > Does this basically mean that RELENG_4 now has version 6.1.4 of em(4)?
>
> My understanding is that now we have 6.1.4's hardware support available
> in RELENG_4, but not the performance enhancements and fixes that does
> not apply to RELENG_4. According to the code it appears like that the
> driver will claim itself as "6.1.4", though. So perhaps we can wrap it
> as "The hardware support and suspend/resume methods of &man.em.4;
> has been updated to the same version available from Intel's &man.em.4;
> driver version 6.1.4."?
Actually, most of the driver is the same. The INTR_FAST + taskqueue stuff
doesn't affect functionality, and that's the only really big diff. The
if_em_hw.[ch] files are identical, for example.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list