cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tip/libacu biz22.c biz31.c courier.c df.c dn11.c hayes.c t3000.c v3451.c v831.c ventel.c src/usr.bin/tip/tip Makefile acu.c acutab.c cmds.c cmdtab.c cu.c hunt.c log.c partab.c pathnames.h remote.c tip.1 tip.c tip.h tipout.c uucplock.c value.c ...

[Robert Watson]

On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:14:30PM +0000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>> ru          2006-08-31 14:14:30 UTC
>>
>>   FreeBSD src repository
>>
>>   Modified files:
>>     usr.bin/tip/libacu   biz22.c biz31.c courier.c df.c dn11.c
>>                          hayes.c t3000.c v3451.c v831.c ventel.c
>>     usr.bin/tip/tip      Makefile acu.c acutab.c cmds.c cmdtab.c
>>                          cu.c hunt.c log.c partab.c pathnames.h
>>                          remote.c tip.1 tip.c tip.h tipout.c
>>                          uucplock.c value.c vars.c
>>   Log:
>>   Resolve merge conflicts.
>>
> For the curious, I'm working on *really* merging the tip(1) manpage changes, 
> and I'll be additionally merging changes to /etc/remote and remote(5) later.
>
> Recently, I've found several bugs in tip(1).  I started fixing them, but 
> then I looked at the OpenBSD, and they seemed to have all been fixed.  New 
> import brings some visible new bugs (when compiled with WARNS=2 for 
> example).  I'm going to address them as well and send patches back to 
> OpenBSD (as well as changes made to manpages).

Are there any noteworthy functional changes in the OpenBSD tip(1)?  I guess 
tip(1) strikes me as a program unlikely to get significant change over time 
(other than cleanup), I'm mostly just curious.

Thanks,

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge