cvs commit: src/tools/regression/lib/libc/resolv Makefile

[John E Hein]

Garance A Drosehn wrote at 13:31 -0500 on Mar  8, 2006:
 > At 8:59 AM -0700 3/8/06, M. Warner Losh wrote:
 > >In message: <20060308150647.GG737 at garage.freebsd.pl>
 > >             Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd at freebsd.org> writes:
 > >: On Wed, Mar 08, 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
 > >: +>
 > >: +> Since we abandoned MAN[1-9].  The fact that many old Makefiles
 > >: +> still use NO_MAN doesn't make it right; NO_MAN is a user knob,
 > >: +> not a Makefile knob (same distinction as between WITH_FOO and
 > >: +> USE_FOO in the ports tree).
 > >:
 > >: Fair enough. Maybe we should fix NO_MAN= uses, so it doesn't
 > >: create confusion?
 > >
 > >Seems like a reasonable thing to do.  Cut and paste copying
 > >of bad examples is a big source of bogusness in our tree...
 > 
 > If we fix this in some makefiles in -current, should we also
 > (eventually) MFC the changes back into RELENG_6?  Or is it
 > only an issue for -current?

Fix share/mk/bsd.README, too.
It says that NO_MAN is a Makefile knob.