cvs commit: src/tools/regression/lib/libc/resolv Makefile

[M. Warner Losh]

In message: <20060308150647.GG737 at garage.freebsd.pl>
            Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd at freebsd.org> writes:
: On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:45:37AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
: +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd at FreeBSD.org> writes:
: +> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:37:11AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
: +> > > > Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume at FreeBSD.org> writes:
: +> > > > >   Log:
: +> > > > >   NOMAN --> NO_MAN
: +> > > > No, the correct spelling is
: +> > > > MAN=
: +> > Since when? I found 36 NO_MAN='s in my tree and none 'MAN='.
: +> 
: +> Since we abandoned MAN[1-9].  The fact that many old Makefiles still
: +> use NO_MAN doesn't make it right; NO_MAN is a user knob, not a
: +> Makefile knob (same distinction as between WITH_FOO and USE_FOO in the
: +> ports tree).
: 
: Fair enough. Maybe we should fix NO_MAN= uses, so it doesn't create
: confusion?

Seems like a reasonable thing to do.  Cut and paste copying of bad
examples is a big source of bogusness in our tree...

Warner