cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_vnops.c

[Greg 'groggy' Lehey]

On Friday,  2 June 2006 at  9:26:13 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 02 June 2006 06:25, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Friday,  2 June 2006 at 10:38:29 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:54:59AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>> On Friday,  2 June 2006 at  2:50:47 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday 01 June 2006 06:01, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:49:50AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
>>>>>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@
>>>>>>>> the file must be open for writing.
>>>>>>>> .Sh RETURN VALUES
>>>>>>>> .Rv -std
>>>>>>>> +If the file to be modified is not a directory or
>>>>>>>> +a regular file, the
>>>>>>>> +.Fn truncate
>>>>>>>> +call will return the value 0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Doesn't "value of 0" sound better?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not to me, though I can't explain why.  I think the phrase "X
>>>>>> will return the value Y" is common in man pages though.
>>>>>
>>>>> "will return" sounds strange to be.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it will be better if you avoid the future tense.
>>>
>>> May I recommend that one of you just change it?
>>
>> What colour?
>
> Shouldn't that be "Which colour?" or even "Which color?" *duck*

I don't think so.  Why should it?

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20060605/96330a9c/attachment.pgp