truss status

[Daniel O'Connor]

On Monday 24 July 2006 10:34, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <des at des.no> writes:
> > > ktrace(1) is better [than truss] in almost all respects.
> >
> > truss is good in that it gives immediate output.
>
> So does ktrace - just run kdump -l on a different terminal.

ktrace is a good disk filling service if you run it like this.

truss IS more convenient.

If kdump could write to a pipe it would be almost as convenient.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20060724/df6fbc61/attachment.pgp