cvs commit: src/sys/dev/le am7990.c am79900.c am79900reg.h
am79900var.h am7990reg.h am7990var.h if_le_ledma.c
if_le_pci.c lance.c lancereg.h lancevar.h
Marius Strobl
marius at alchemy.franken.de
Tue Jan 31 07:39:18 PST 2006
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:01:57AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Marius Strobl wrote:
> > marius 2006-01-31 14:48:58 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Added files:
> > sys/dev/le am7990.c am79900.c am79900reg.h
> > am79900var.h am7990reg.h am7990var.h
> > if_le_ledma.c if_le_pci.c lance.c
> > lancereg.h lancevar.h
> > Log:
> > Add le(4), a driver for AMD Am7900 LANCE and Am79C9xx PCnet NICs ported
> > from NetBSD. This driver actually can replace lnc(4). Advantages over
> > lnc(4) are:
> > - Cleaner and more flexible regarding MD needs.
> > - Endian-clean and MPSAFE.
> > - Supports ALTQ, VLAN_MTU, ifmedia.
> > - Uses 32bit DMA for the PCI variants.
> >
> > This commit includes front-ends for the dma(4) pseudo-bus found on SBus-
> > based sparc64 machines (thus supports the on-board LANCE in Sun Ultra 1)
> > and PCI. In order to actually replace lnc(4), the front-ends for ISA and
> > the PC98 CBUS would have to be added but for which I don't have hardware
> > to test.
> >
> > Reviewed and some improvements by: yongari
> > Tested on: i386, sparc64
> >
>
> Excellent job! One question, though. I believe that VMWare emulates
> Lance hardware. If your new le driver works on that, then I see no
> reason to not disable the lnc driver and enable the le driver by
> default.
>
The NetBSD version is known to work with the VMWare LANCE (it actually
also has the same workaround as lnc(4) for a bug in the emulation) so
I think the ported version also will. I haven't given that a try so
far however and only tested it with real PCI hardware as my main goal
is to get it into RELENG_6 as soon as possible in order to get it
into 6.1 (without replacing lnc(4) in the default config). If someone
could give it a try with VMWare so I don't need to get a copy and
probably a Windows installation that would be really great though.
My plan is to let le(4) replace lnc(4) in the mid term however.
Regarding getting it into RELENG_6 for inclusion in 6.1 what time
for the MFC would you prefer from the re@ point of view?
Marius
--
This mail was scanned by AntiVir Milter.
This product is licensed for non-commercial use.
See www.antivir.de for details.
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list