cvs commit: src/contrib/ipfilter HISTORY Makefile bpf_filter.c
ip_fil.c ipf.h ipmon.h ipt.h kmem.h mlfk_rule.c opts.h
radix.c radix_ipf.h snoop.h src/contrib/ipfilter/BSD Makefile
Makefile.ipsend kupgrade src/contrib/ipfilter/iplang iplang_l.l ...
John Baldwin
jhb at freebsd.org
Thu Aug 24 19:33:27 UTC 2006
On Thursday 24 August 2006 12:03, Scott Long wrote:
> Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:36:28 +0200
> > Guido van Rooij <guido at gvr.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:20:02AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:37:12 +0000 (UTC)
> >>>Guido van Rooij <guido at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>guido 2006-08-24 07:37:12 UTC
> >>>>
> >>
> >>[..]
> >>
> >>
> >>>> Log:
> >>>> MFC: ipfilter 4.1.13
> >>>
> >>>This begs for a question: if ipfilter can not be updated without
> >>>breaking the tree anymore, does it belong there in the first place?
> >>
> >>We could of course also get rid of the tree ;)
> >>
> >>-Guido
> >
> > Tree without ipfilter or ipfilter without tree - this is a
> > technicality.
> >
> > Seriously though, I wonder how ipfilter is being tested before being
> > checked in? Past two commits by you suggested that no testing was done
> > at all.
> >
>
> Missing an added file when doing a check-in is a forgivable mistake,
> especially since Guido isn't the author and likely doesn't have as deep
> of an understanding of the changes as the author does. And, I do highly
> appreciate that Guido is responding quickly to the problems. The
> process with ipfilter still isn't perfect, but it's definitely an
> improvement over the past.
Yes, this is the first import Guido has done, and I think it has gone well
relatively speaking. Overall I think ipfilter imports will become less
eventful in the future than they have been in the past.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list