cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
Prafulla Deuskar
pdeuskar at FreeBSD.org
Fri Aug 4 16:29:53 UTC 2006
Andre Oppermann [andre at freebsd.org] wrote:
> Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> >Gleb Smirnoff [glebius at FreeBSD.org] wrote:
> >> Prafulla,
> >>
> >>On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:05:05PM +0000, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> >>P> pdeuskar 2006-08-03 19:05:05 UTC
> >>P>
> >>P> FreeBSD src repository
> >>P>
> >>P> Modified files:
> >>P> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h
> >>P> Log:
> >>P> Revert back changes to made in rev 1.109 of if_em.c which were
> >>unnecessary.
> >>P> This makes it easier for us to get the changes into -current and to
> >>-stable quickly.
> >>
> >>Can you please confirm that this was a mechanical substitution like this:
> >>
> >>s/sc/adapter/g
> >>s/em_softc/adapter/g
> >>
> >>and no more additional changes? If this is true, then I hope that we
> >>(FreeBSD and Intel) have finally came to a common codebase. This is good.
> >>:)
> >>I can stand the long unusual name for driver softc with no problems.
> >>
> >>I'm only a bit disappointed by the fact, that I haven't received a single
> >>email about these plans. You were in the void for a long time, and
> >>then began your work with a commit, w/o informing people who were
> >>maintaining driver while the vendor maintanance was on a hiatus.
> >>
> >
> >Yes - it was a mechanical substitution.
>
> According to jb at freebsd.org at least one non-mechanical change slipped
> in breaking his Sun4v box. AFAIR some fix in/with bus_dmamap_unload()
> was reverted.
I have looked at the diffs again after jb@ mentioned it last night.
I don't think I have made any functionality changes.
Thanks,
Prafulla
>
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list