cvs commit: src/etc rc.firewall

[Hajimu UMEMOTO]

Hi,

>>>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:34:49 -0800
>>>>> Julian Elischer <julian at elischer.org> said:

julian> Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:

julian> huh?
julian> divert of an ipv6 packet still makes sense!

I don't say that divert of an IPv6 doesn't make sence.  The existing
implementation of both divert and nat cannot handle an IPv6.  So, when
an IPv6 support for ipfw2 is enabled, the line doesn't pass the IPv6
packets.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/