cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/config configvers.h

[Ceri Davies]

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:56:01PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:34:36AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:16:44AM +0000, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > > imp         2005-11-04 04:16:44 UTC
> > > > 
> > > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > > > 
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     usr.sbin/config      configvers.h 
> > > >   Log:
> > > >   since nocpu isn't used in the kernel config base, we don't need to
> > > >   bump the version.  Peter Wemm, John Baldwin and I hammered this out
> > > >   after the last time I needlessly incremented the version.
> > > >   
> > > >   Revision  Changes    Path
> > > >   1.38      +1 -1      src/usr.sbin/config/configvers.h
> > > > 
> > > Our users wanted to *use* the "nocpu" directive in their configs
> > > that are based on GENERIC (GENERIC is included), hence I bumped
> > > config(8).  Otherwise, one day some would scream that "nocpu"
> > > doesn't work for them, because they're using the older version
> > > of config(8).
> > 
> > I'd agree that the Makefiles don't need to be bumped, as they don't
> > actually require the new config, but config has new functionality and
> > the version should probably be bumped in the binary.
> > 
> You cannot just bump it in one place, the version requirement doesn't
> understand >=, only =.

Oh.  Insert obvious next question here. :)
What happens to those people who have already installed 600004 then?

Ceri
-- 
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.			  -- Einstein (attrib.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20051104/5bc1d967/attachment.bin