cvs commit: src/lib/msun/i387 fenv.c fenv.h

[Maxim Sobolev]

David Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005, Warner Losh wrote:
> 
>>>You had better bump the version number for libm before 6.0 rolls
>>>around!!  I've just found a 3rd party binary-only package that
>>>supports 'FreeBSD 5.x' but is linked against libm.so.2.  Ugh.  We
>>>need to bury that mistake and NOT make it again.
>>
>>6.0 already has /lib/libm.so.3
> 
> 
> So does 5.3.  I think Scott's point is that if we're going to bump
> it for 6.X at all, we had better do it soon or risk running into
> the same mess we had before.  I agree with that, although at
> present I don't know of a compelling reason to do the bump the
> libm version number at all.

Haven't several functions been removed from -CURRENT version of libm 
recently? IMHO this provides sufficient reason for version bump. 
Actually I think it makes sense to bump all libraries automatically when 
-CURRENT goes one major number up. There is just no much sense in 
preserving partial compatibility.

-Maxim