cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS

[M. Warner Losh]

In message: <20050526080342.GA1384 at schweikhardt.net>
            Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh at schweikhardt.net> writes:
: On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:29:58PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: # In message: <20050525211809.GD1597 at schweikhardt.net>
: #             Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh at schweikhardt.net> writes:
: # : Warner,
: # : 
: # : # Actually, core had announced that we wanted people to move into
: # : # src/MAINTAINERS and were going to remove the lintes from the Makefiles
: # : # and NOT place them in src/MAINTAINERS.  These commits have made that
: # : # harder. :-(
: # : # 
: # : # Warner
: # : 
: # : I don't understand how this makes it harder. It should be easier, as
: # : there are no more false positives now at the bottom of MAINTAINERS. What
: # : am I missing?
: # 
: # The bottom of MAINTAINERS was to be deleted entirely without even
: # looking at the top part, along with the lines from Makefiles entreily.
: # Since it was moved to the top, it is hard to know what to delete
: # without looking into the CVS logs...
: 
: Aah, then there's a misunderstanding here. Nothing was moved to the top
: (at least not by me). I only updated the bottom part to match reality,
: i.e. removed lines where some maintainer removed himself from a Makefile
: but forgot to remove himself from the bottom in src/MAINTAINERS.

OK.  I'st just had time to review what you'd done.  I misunderstood
what you'd done.  Sorry for the hassle.

: So if the plan is to scrap the bottom, plus MAINTAINER= in Makefiles
: entirely without further inquiries we're in violent agreement. But
: I'll leave that to you, as it appears that touching MAINTAINERS is a
: recipe for heat generation :-)

There's a long history to that file that isn't entirely happy and
joyful.

Warner