cvs commit: src/etc rc.subr
Ceri Davies
ceri at submonkey.net
Mon Dec 5 02:37:33 PST 2005
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:38:11AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Ceri Davies wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:04:15AM +0000, Doug Barton wrote:
> >>dougb 2005-12-05 07:04:15 UTC
> >>
> >> FreeBSD src repository
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> >> etc rc.subr
> >> Log:
> >> Change how *.sh scripts are handled. If the script is in /etc/rc.d,
> >> source it into the shell. If not, handle it in a subshell the same
> >> way that "real" rc.d-style scripts are handled. This will dramatically
> >> ease the "process local scripts in the base rcorder" transition.
> >
> >Are you planning to do this for /usr/local/etc/rc.d as well?
>
> For the purposes of the new world order (other than sourcing /etc/rc.d/*.sh
> into the shell), scripts in /etc/rc.d/ and ${local_startup}/rc.d are
> handled the same way.
Ok, it's the sourcing that I was worried about.
> >I often
> >take the execute bit off old-rc type scripts in there to disable them,
> >and that would obviously become a problem should this get applied there
> >too.
>
> Not obvious at all. :) If there is no execute bit on the script, it will
> not get run, no matter where it resides.
Sure. Sourcing is a different matter though.
Ceri
--
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20051205/505deea0/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list