cvs commit: src/etc Makefile

[Makoto Matsushita]

Thank for working a better bind9 configuration, but:

dougb>   Modified files:
dougb>     etc                  Makefile 
dougb>   Log:
dougb>   Install namedb stuff to ${DESTDIR}/var/named/etc/namedb instead
dougb>   of relying on the symlink in ${DESTDIR}/etc/namedb.

Recent changes impose me that it would be hard to use named _without_
having a chroot sandbox.  Is it true and/or intented?  If so,
src/etc/rc.d/named script doesn't need to care if have named_chroot="".

At this time (until I've tested chrooted named by _myself_), I don't
want to use chroot sandbox for named(8) -- can I still do that?

-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita