cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c

[John Baldwin]

On Monday 01 November 2004 07:31 am, Nik Clayton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:44:08PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> > Ok, last try at a compromise.  If I commit the fix to todo
>
> [...]
>
> If J. Random committer fixes something on the ToDo list, and gets re@
> approval to merge it back to the appropriate branch, why isn't J. Random
> committer updating the ToDo list at the same time?
>
> Seems to me if you've gone to all the trouble of fixing an item on the
> ToDo list it's only fair that you get to be the one that gets to remove
> it from there too.

re@ decided to manage the todo list itself as people were adding items to the 
todo list without asking re@ if they were really show stoppers first, etc.  
Perhaps re@'s "managing" of the todo list can use some more refinement.  
Having it be a static webpage is actually not always intuitive, would be nice 
if it was in some kind of tracking system instead (along with all the merge 
requests).

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org