cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_resource.c

[Julian Elischer]

yes, but the posix priority stuff all affects the entire process
so we are diverging from that.


On Sat, 8 May 2004, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> On Sat, 8 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> > julian      2004/05/08 01:56:05 PDT
> > 
> >   FreeBSD src repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     sys/kern             kern_resource.c 
> >   Log:
> >   Fix rtprio() to do sensible things when called from threaded processes.
> >   It's not quite correct from a posix Point Of view, but it is a lot better
> >   than what was there before. This will be revisited later
> >   when we decide what form our priority extensions will take. Posix doesn't
> >   specify  how a system scope thread can change its priority so you need to
> >   add non-standard extensions to be able to do it..
> >   For now make this slightly non standard to allow it to be done.
> 
> rtprio() isn't in the standard, so you can make it have
> any behavior you want.  It's only nice() and sched_setparam()
> that operate on the process as a whole.
> 
> -- 
> Dan Eischen
> 
>