cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c AsyncIO.h Makefile Makefile.dos PROBLEMS ParseBuffer.c README README.booting_dos bios.c callback.c callback.h cmos.c com.h config.c cp

[Garance A Drosihn]

At 1:54 PM -0800 3/24/04, Doug Barton wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:
>>
>  > Did you *really* have consensus for this??  Several committers
>  > said it worked fine and some said they'd like it to remain in
>  > /usr/src.
>
>My recollection of the discussion was something like this:
>
>1. Can we remove doscmd from the base and make it a port?
>2. NO! doscmd works and I use it!
>3. But we can easily make doscmd a port.
>4. Oh, well, ok, but maybe we should wait till 6.0?
>5. A. At this point, tjr assented to waiting,

Not only did he assent, but he said MULTIPLE TIMES in multiple
messages that he had decided to wait until 6.0.  I think he even
asked people to stop complaining because he had agreed to wait.

>    B. but others mentioned that if we're going to do it, let's
>       do it before 5.3 so that 5-stable looks more like what we
>       want it to look.
>6. I heard no objections to 5.

I heard no objections to 5A.  People didn't object to 5B, because
they thought 5A pretty much settled the matter.  Particularly
after tjr said "HEY, I've already agreed to wait!".

ongoing disclaimer: I personally don't care about doscmd...  Don't
bring it back on my account.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih at rpi.edu