cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils Makefile.inc0

[Ruslan Ermilov]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:00:08AM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Sure, but I think we should stick with what GNU configure would pick
> > if it was run with getopt_long() in libc, either FSF or our libc
> > version.
> 
> There is no similarity in that point in ports. Some ports search for 
> getopt_long() (and got it from libc, of course), but some compile their 
> own copies in anycase.
> 
My own opinion is that we should let them do this.  If you are in
a mood of fixing binutils autoconf files to check for existence of
getopt_long() and submit them back to BU maintainers, or just throw
them an idea, that would be great, and if accepted, future imports
will do it automatically.  David won't even probably notice that,
and I'll be forced to fix the upgrade path from RELENG_4.  Hell,
but I've dealt with it already.  ;)


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
FreeBSD committer
ru at FreeBSD.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20040315/52ae6199/attachment.bin