cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 ct.4
Roman Kurakin
rik at cronyx.ru
Thu Mar 4 09:05:53 PST 2004
non at ever.sanda.gr.jp wrote:
>From: Roman Kurakin <rik at cronyx.ru>
>Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 01:02:06 +0300
>
>
>>Renaming of one of the devices would solve naming problems but
>>it would hit one group of users. I think there is a compromis
>>
>>1. If we have PC98, man4.i386 wouldn't appear in such installation.
>>So man ct wouldn't confuse scsi ct users.
>>
>>
>
>Currently, no. Pages in man4.i386 are also installed for i386/pc98.
>
>
>>2. If we have i386 installation and man for scsi ct would be added
>>we just need something like man4.pc98 to put it there and it would
>>be hidden in i386 arch for Cronyx/Tau users.
>>
>>
>
>Well, I have had ct.4 for several months. I was suggested not to
>commit ct.4 into man4.i386 but to create man4.pc98 and add into it by
>Warner-san.
>
>Probably we can create man4.pc98, then copy and modify Makefile so
>that we don't have to put copys into man4.pc98 (I am not sure here),
>and change src/share/man/man4/Makefile,
>
>--- /usr/src/share/man/man4/Makefile Wed Jul 16 09:03:29 2003
>+++ Makefile Thu Mar 4 10:58:07 2004
>@@ -355,8 +355,8 @@
> MLINKS+=xl.4 if_xl.4
>
> # XXX NOT IMPORTED: man4.hp300 man4.sparc man4.tahoe man4.vax
>-.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE_ARCH})
>-SUBDIR= man4.${MACHINE_ARCH}
>+.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE})
>+SUBDIR= man4.${MACHINE}
> .endif
>
> .include <bsd.prog.mk>
>
>
>Or maybe,
>man4/man4.i386 common
>man4/man4.i386/i386 specific to i386
>man4/man4.i386/pc98 specific to pc98
>
>
This is better, cause I if get right, we could have MACHINE_ARCH=i386
and MACHINE
other thane i386 or pc98.
Roman
>// Noriaki Mitsunaga
>
>
>
>
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list