HEADSUP: Native preemption added to the kernel scheduler
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Fri Jul 2 22:39:44 PDT 2004
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 12:24:18AM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >In theory this is a big NOP except for some small optimizations in the
> >form of avoiding a few context switches and avoiding some run queue
> >operations. Several people have tested this code but there may be some
> >remaining adventures. Note that this adds a printf during dmesg for
> >architectures that do not support preemption about preemption being
> >disabled and degrading performance (mostly via increased latency).
> >Preemption is enabled by defining PREEMPTION in <machine/param.h> and
> >architecture porters are encouraged to get preemption working on their
> >architecture.
> >
> >
> >
>
> The GENERIC kernel is failing to build now (12AM 7-03-2004) ...
> complaining about wrong number of arguments in the following file:
>
> src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c
>
> Unfortunately, I did not get the function details before rebooting my
> machine into windows.
That was fixed a few hours ago.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20040702/91442191/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list