cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 Makefile boot0.s boot0_512.s boot0sio.s

Ruslan Ermilov ru at FreeBSD.org
Wed Apr 28 00:29:10 PDT 2004


On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:37:10PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
[...]
> > If we have such a convention: yes.  I wasn't aware of it.
> > 
> It has been the convention since before I made the first bootblocks.
> The Makefiles know how to produce a .s from a .S using the C
> preprocessor.
> (or did I get this the other way around :-)
> 
It's not a "convention" per se.  Instead, it gives the correct
hint to the compiler.  From gcc.info:

: `FILE.s'
:      Assembler code.
: 
: `FILE.S'
:      Assembler code which must be preprocessed.
: 
: `-x c'
: `-x c++'
: `-x objective-c'
: `-x assembler-with-cpp'
:      Specify the source language: C, C++, Objective-C, or assembly.
:      This has nothing to do with standards conformance or extensions;
:      it merely selects which base syntax to expect.  If you give none
:      of these options, cpp will deduce the language from the extension
:      of the source file: `.c', `.cc', `.m', or `.S'.  Some other common
:      extensions for C++ and assembly are also recognized.  If cpp does
:      not recognize the extension, it will treat the file as C; this is
:      the most generic mode.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20040428/76cb81ff/attachment.bin


More information about the cvs-src mailing list