cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.lib.mk

[David O'Brien]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:56:59PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:01:29AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:27:55PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> [...]
> > > > GCC should have additional changes then.  It is going to confuse other
> > > > things to have the symlink in one directory and the real libs in another.
> > > > 
> > > I will look into what else is needed in our toolchain to get rid of these
> > > symlinks, and get back to you, David.
> > 
> > Keep which ever symlinks you want /lib or /usr/lib -- but we should be
> > totally unambigious as to which are the "real" ones, and don't install
> > the other.  Installing two sets of symlinks isn't the way to go.
> >  
> Sure.  The fix is to make ``cc --print-search-dirs'' output include
> the /lib directory too.  

That is trival.

> I'm currently testing some patches with bsd.lib.mk,v 1.152.

We should all agree on where the symlink for things like libc.so.X live.
I'm 99% sure Peter will argue /usr/lib, and I personally don't care -- I
just want one of them.  Before commiting yet something else to
bsd.lib.mk, what direction are you going in?