cvs commit: src/lib/libc/rpc clnt_simple.c

Peter Jeremy PeterJeremy at optushome.com.au
Thu Oct 30 11:59:48 PST 2003


On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:32:37PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>Yes.  More correct.  For the same reason that
>
>      while (foo) {
>      ...
>      }
>
>is more correct than:
>
>top:
>	if (foo) goto out;
>	...
>	goto top;
>out:
>
>In that it is the more appropriate construct to use in the context.
>Even though they are both guaranteed to be the same, one is more
>correct than the other.

Just to nit-pick but the two conditional tests are complements.  One
needs a '!' to make them the same.

Peter


More information about the cvs-src mailing list