cvs commit: src/usr.bin/chat Makefile

[Peter Jeremy]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:28:24PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
>Similarly for `return (log(3));`.  gcc doesn't do the log() inline, at
>least on i386's with no options, but it knows to pass 3.0 and convert
>the return value to int.

It shouldn't.  If I write:
	int foo(int x)
	{
		return (log(x));
	}
without explicitly declaring any prototype for log(), gcc should
assume a declaration "int log(int);".  Arbitrarily deciding that
the declaration should be "double log(double);" breaks K&R C and
C90 programs.

It seems that gcc is diverging more and more from the ISO standards.

Peter