cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 frag6.c

Wed Oct 22 08:53:54 PDT 2003

Hi,

>>>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:45:31 -0700
>>>>> Sam Leffler <sam at errno.com> said:

sam> The convention used throughout the kernel is for

sam> FOO_LOCK_ASSERT()

sam> to generate an assertion that the specified lock is held.  It would be good 
sam> for the IPv6 code to do likewise (you appear to be using FOO_LOCK_CHECK 
sam> instead).

Yes, I know.  But, I don't want to make diffs against KAME as
possible.  So, I didn't rename IP6Q_LOCK_CHECK to IP6Q_LOCK_ASSERT.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at mahoroba.org  ume at bisd.hitachi.co.jp  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/