cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica acconfig.h acenv.h acfreebsd.h acgcc.h acpi.h acpiosxf.h acpixf.h acutils.h dbcmds.c dbxface.c exfldio.c exsystem.c hwsleep.c psparse.c rscreate.c tbget.c utglobal.c

M. Warner Losh imp at bsdimp.com
Thu May 1 18:06:27 PDT 2003


In message: <20030501193258.GB778 at athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
            Marcel Moolenaar <marcel at xcllnt.net> writes:
: The question: do people think we should try to get another ACPI
: snapshot in (provided we have someone willing to do it) and thus
: try to get it fixed the "official" way or are we ok with changing
: contrib'd code in this case and revert to the vendor branch when
: we do upgrade sometime after 5.1?

We must have another snapshot with all the breakages that this import
caused fixed.  If Nate isn't willing to do it, I would be.  In the
long term it is in our best interest to get the issues resolved with
the Intel code.

Warner


More information about the cvs-src mailing list