cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica acconfig.h acenv.h
acfreebsd.h acgcc.h acpi.h acpiosxf.h acpixf.h acutils.h dbcmds.c
dbxface.c exfldio.c exsystem.c hwsleep.c psparse.c rscreate.c tbget.c
utglobal.c
M. Warner Losh
imp at bsdimp.com
Thu May 1 18:06:27 PDT 2003
In message: <20030501193258.GB778 at athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
Marcel Moolenaar <marcel at xcllnt.net> writes:
: The question: do people think we should try to get another ACPI
: snapshot in (provided we have someone willing to do it) and thus
: try to get it fixed the "official" way or are we ok with changing
: contrib'd code in this case and revert to the vendor branch when
: we do upgrade sometime after 5.1?
We must have another snapshot with all the breakages that this import
caused fixed. If Nate isn't willing to do it, I would be. In the
long term it is in our best interest to get the issues resolved with
the Intel code.
Warner
More information about the cvs-src
mailing list