cvs commit: src/release/scripts print-cdrom-packages.sh

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:39:04PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Robert Watson <rwatson at FreeBSD.org> [031130 19:30] wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:48:44PM -0800, Scott Long wrote:
> > > > scottl      2003/11/29 15:48:44 PST
> > > > 
> > > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > > > 
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     release/scripts      print-cdrom-packages.sh 
> > > >   Log:
> > > >   vim-lite can hardly be considered 'lite'.  Remove it.
> > > 
> > > Why isn't it "lite"?
> > >     -rw-r--r--  1 portmgr  archive       2M Nov 18 01:09 vim-lite-6.2.139.tbz
> > > 
> > > Lets look at the Emacs editors you left behind:
> > >     -rw-r--r--  1 portmgr  archive       11M Nov 21 17:21 emacs-21.3.tbz
> > > 
> > > I predict you will become very unpopular for this commit.
> > > Please remove Emacs instead.
> > 
> > Maybe compared to vim, and both vim and vim-lite were previously on CD1? 
> > 
> > 2662422 vim-6.2.139.tbz
> > 2195668 vim-lite-6.2.139.tbz
> 
> vim-lite is really nice to have around and I have to agree...
> wait...
> anyone really tired of nvi?... and wants us to be a little more
> like OS X?  And let's not forget helping the children of Uganda... :)
> 
> When are we going to replace nvi with vim-without-x11?

Is this really that worth it?  Speaking for myself, I'm perfectly happy
with nvi, and had never felt like installing any of vim* ports.

./danfe