cvs commit: src/sys/sys proc.h

[Gordon Tetlow]

On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 02:30:33PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I think here there is room for more input at the design stage.  Perhaps
> > that is happening on threads@ (which I'm not reading ATM, E2MUCHEMAIL)?
> > I just would like to the see the design hammered out before a lot of
> > code gets written as it is easier to change the design when you don't
> > have a pile of code already depending on it.
> 
> All the design was done aboth 6 months ago on the KSE mailing list.
> unfortunatly all that went straight out the window when the
> signal masks were moved from the process to the thread.

If this is the case, why isn't there a new design for others to review
rather than committing something without any supporting code around it?
Fields should generally be introduced when they are going to be used.

-gordon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20030418/083d6535/attachment.bin