cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c

[Sam Leffler]

> >> So I really don't know why or what compelled you to attack me here,
> >> whatever it was: please try to control it better in the future.
> >
> >Given your past history of summarily axing and/or modifying code w/o
> >consulting folks I can see why someone might respond as Nate did.
>
> I could maybe be persuaded that somebody might respond.
>
> I certainly cannot see why one would respond "as Nate did".
>
> At the very least I'd expect them to check the basic facts first.
>
> And as I have understood it, core@ would expect them to keep a
> a significantly less confrontational style than Nate did.
>
> But maybe that's just me...

Please don't trim my replies to change their intent.  My msg concluded with
the following:

"If you had noted that Ken had reviewed your changes I expect this never
would have happened.  Both parties are at fault here; consider the view from
the other side too."

    Sam