cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c

[Sam Leffler]

> Second, I have discussed this particular change with ken@,
> who as you correctly point out is the maintainer, and he
> agreed that the function was unused.
>

Then why wasn't ken@ referenced in your commit msg?

> So I really don't know why or what compelled you to attack me here,
> whatever it was: please try to control it better in the future.

Given your past history of summarily axing and/or modifying code w/o
consulting folks I can see why someone might respond as Nate did.  If you
had noted that Ken had reviewed your changes I expect this never would have
happened.  Both parties are at fault here; consider the view from the other
side too.

    Sam