cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo

[Chris Rees]

On May 24, 2012 8:43 PM, "Jason Helfman" <jgh at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Eitan Adler thus spake:
> >On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval.
> >> However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I
believe
> >> isn't necessary the maintainer approval.
> >
> >portmgr or secteam still needs to approve.
> >
> >
> Not only was this a bugfix, but it also covered a CVE. Is that still
> required for a timeout?

Portmgr or the Security Officer (note not secteam) still should approve,
strictly speaking.

Chris