cvs commit: ports/textproc/xqilla Makefile distinfo
Alexey Dokuchaev
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jul 16 13:09:00 UTC 2010
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:08:43PM +0800, Vanilla Hsu wrote:
> xqilla 2.2.4 required xerces-c version 3.x, that's why i did not commit this
> pr.
Which in turn raises these questions:
- Why PR number was not referenced in the commit log? (148273)
- Why didn't you (vanilla@) added the requirement for new xerces in audit
log, and/or marked the PR as analyzed or pending feedback?
- If 2.2.4 is totally broken with current xerces-c, how is that possible
at all that this got committed? It suggests that no required run-time
testing was done, if even build fails. Am I missing something, or
things got really bad here?
./danfe
>
> 2010/7/16 Pietro Cerutti <gahr at freebsd.org>
>
> > gahr 2010-07-16 10:14:11 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > textproc/xqilla Makefile distinfo
> > Log:
> > - Update to 2.2.4
> >
> > Approved by: maintainer (timeout after 15 days)
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list