cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/linux-f8-openmotif Makefile pkg-plist

[Boris Samorodov]

On Wed, 13 May 2009 00:35:31 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 21:28:06 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <bsam at ipt.ru> wrote:

> > On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:56:53 -0400 Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > > Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > 
> > > >   No PORTREVISION bump is needed.
> > > > | -BUILD_DEPENDS=	rpm2cpio:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/rpm
> > > I thought you always had to BUMP PORTREVISION when changing DEPENDS
> > > since you directly affect the resultant package ? Can you enlighten
> > > me ?
> > 
> > Two arguments:
> > . the package for this port is never built;

> In general, this argument is is wrong, as one can use FORCE_PACKAGES to
> build them locally.

I was talking about oficial packages. As for custom packages I'm
not sure if we should bump PORTREVISION when any custom package
may be affected by a commit. Should a PORTREVISION be bumped if
non-defaults (say, OPTIONS) are changed?

> > . this dependency still (indirectly) exists since this port
> >   depends upon linux_base-f8 which depends upon archivers/rpm.

> So the make describe output is the same?

Strictly speaking, no: archivers/rpm moved from build_depends
to extract_depends. But that doesn't affect a package using.

Those two arguments in conjunction convinced me not to bump
PORTREVISION.


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve