cvs commit: ports/astro/nightfall Makefile
ports/benchmarks/himenobench
Makefile ports/benchmarks/hpl Makefile ports/biology/molden Makefile
ports/biology/ortep3 Makefile ports/biology/platon Makefile
ports/biology/psi88 Makefile ports/biology/tinker ...
Gerald Pfeifer
gerald at pfeifer.com
Thu Jan 8 19:58:27 UTC 2009
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Because all the fortran code must be recompiled against new and
> incompatible fortran library.
Yep. Strictly speaking, only ports with USE_FORTRAN=yes that depend on
some other port that has USE_FORTRAN=yes, or ports with USE_FORTRAN=yes
which some other port that has USE_FORTRAN=yes depends on would have
needed the bump (modulo potential additional "manual" dependencies).
I believe we do not have a reasonable way to determine such a cover, and
all those OPTIONS and knobs make this even more tricky. And the result
likely would have been pretty close to the full set anyway...
Gerald
--
Gerald (Jerry) Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list