cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:11:15PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>> 
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:36:58AM +0000, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> dougb       2008-01-24 02:36:58 UTC
>>> 
>>>   FreeBSD ports repository
>>> 
>>>   Modified files:        (Branch: 2.0)
>>>     ports-mgmt/portmaster/files portmaster.sh.in   Log:
>>>   The code for this 2.0 version has been totally reorganized, and
>>>   in several cases totally rewritten. I am also glad to say that
>>>   all of the advertised features now work as advertised.  :)
>> ...
>> 
>> Did you just branch the ports CVS repo?
> 
> No, it's just a version number bump. AFAICT the "branch" stuff above is 
> added by the script that generates the e-mail. If you look at the cvs logs 
> themselves you can see that there are no branches.
> 
> But your concern is reasonable, I had a moment of panic myself when I saw 
> the e-mail. :)

Yeah, looks a bit odd - I wonder why the revision number of that file
was suddently bumped from 1.28 to 2.0 [1] by CVS...

Brix
[1]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/Makefile
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix at FreeBSD.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 209 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20080124/d2ae8298/attachment.pgp