cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4 Makefile
ports/emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 Makefile
ports/emulators/linux_base-suse-9.2 Makefile
ports/emulators/linux_base-suse-9.3 Makefile
ports/emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage1 Makefile ports/emu
Boris Samorodov
bsam at ipt.ru
Thu Oct 5 09:09:46 PDT 2006
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:49:53 +0400 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 10/5/06, Boris Samorodov <bsam at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > bsam 2006-10-05 15:32:10 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > emulators/linux_base-fc4 Makefile
> > emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 Makefile
> > emulators/linux_base-suse-9.2 Makefile
> > emulators/linux_base-suse-9.3 Makefile
> > emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage1 Makefile
> > emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage2 Makefile
> > emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 Makefile
> > x11/linux-XFree86-libs Makefile
> > Log:
> > Remove deleted linux_base-* and linux_locale* ports from CONFLICTS variable
> > of the remaining linux ports.
> >
> > Reviewed by: netchild (agreed in principle)
> IMHO, you really shouldn't do that. People with old packages
> installed should not worry about trying out new ports. Now you've
> opened a way for their systems to be messed up.
Well, we are speaking about already deleted ports. Once they were
deleted and user's ports tree updated any adding/removing should be
done according to /usr/ports/UPDATING (i.e. reading about default
linux_base port and how to upgrade).
Once a user uses fixed ports tree and pre-built packages there should
be no problems.
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list