cvs commit: ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo

[Anton Berezin]

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:05:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +-le 22/09/2005 20:40 +0200, Anton Berezin écrivait :
> | On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:40:36AM +0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
> |> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:48:34AM +0000, Anton Berezin wrote:

> |> >   Update to 1.15.  Require perl from ports.  Assign maintainer to perl at .

> |> Just curious...
> |> 
> |> Is it a policy to assign maintainer to perl@ for the ports@ owned p5-*
> |> ports?
> | 
> | Not really, it's a matter of personal preference.  I did not feel like
> | having a maintainer lock on some of those ports, but I did not want them
> | to stay unmaintained, either.  There is, I think, a better chance that
> | someone (myself included) will take care of such when they belong to
> | perl@ as opposed to ports at .
> 
> In other words, you want them maintained, but not by you ;-)

That, I suppose, is one way to look at it, although it is not quite what
I have had in mind.

\Anton.
-- 
An undefined problem has an infinite number of solutions.
-- Robert A. Humphrey