cvs commit: ports/mail/postfix distinfo
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Sat Oct 1 13:54:03 PDT 2005
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:37:27 +0200
Mathieu Arnold <mat at mat.cc> wrote:
> +-Le 01/10/2005 23:03 +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu a dit :
> | On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:59:45 +0200
> | Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> |
> |> Mathieu Arnold pí__e v so 01. 10. 2005 v 15:53 +0200:
> |> >
> |> > +-le 28/09/2005 19:02 +0000, Marcus Alves Grando écrivait :
> |> > | mnag 2005-09-28 19:02:14 UTC
> |> > |
> |> > | FreeBSD ports repository
> |> > |
> |> > | Modified files:
> |> > | mail/postfix distinfo
> |> > | Log:
> |> > | VDA bugfix
> |> > |
> |> > | Approved by: vivek at khera.org (maintainer via email), pav
> |> > (mentor) |
> |> > | Revision Changes Path
> |> > | 1.68 +2 -2 ports/mail/postfix/distinfo
> |> >
> |> > Couldn't you have bumped PORTREVISION ?
> |>
> |> No PORTREVISION bumps on changes that only modifies features which
> are |> disabled by default.
> |
> | What's the logic in this ? I should read each commit log for all the
> | ports if I don't use the defaults ?
>
> Yes, I was wondering wether to reply something like that :-)
> I think the logic is to bump it when the package changes.
Yeh, well, then it's an "incomplete" logic.
I have
# pkg_info -Ia |wc -l
726
only on my desktop; if I add my servers, customer desktops, etc. I think
I get past 1000; and enough of them are with non-default options.
Cross-referencing them in mind is just impossible.
--
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list