cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base-8 Makefile

[Trevor Johnson]

Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:21:34PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 07:41:02PM +0000, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> > > > trevor      2004-12-30 19:41:02 UTC
> > > >
> > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > >
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     emulators/linux_base-8 Makefile
> > > >   Log:
> > > >   On amd64, the installation script contained in the glibc RPM fails.
> > > >   Work around this by using the --noscripts option.
> > > >
> > > >   PR:             75645
> > > >   Submitted by:   Carlos F. A. Paniago and Conrad J. Sabatier
> > >
> > > I thought I'd made myself sufficiently clear in previous requests,
> > > but:
> > >
> > >   * Do not make any further commits to the files affected by the
> > >     linux_base-8 patchset without approval from myself or netchild. *
> > >
> > > We're hard up against the ports freeze and still trying to get the
> > > patchsets to work, and we can do without further patch conflicts and
> > > accidental mistakes breaking the ports.
> >
> > The patch as submitted in PR 70539 made no changes to the linux_base-8
> > port itself.  The patch you were testing was never revealed to me.  I
> > honoured your request for several days, while obrien was permitted to make
> > numerous changes to these ports.  I just decided that that you were being
> > unreasonable.
>
> It was announced on several mailing lists (ports, x11), including at
> least one that I know you are on (ports-developers).

I see your message to the ports list:
<URL:http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=658390+661732+/usr/local/www/db/text/2004/freebsd-ports/20041226.freebsd-ports>,
however not only am I am behind in keeping up with the list, but the
message was never delivered to me.

I made it clear in messages to portmgr that several aspects of this patch
went against my wishes as maintainer, yet my messages were ignored.  That
is shabby.
-- 
Trevor Johnson